From the perspective of an inflation-targeting central bank, the problem is that most of these short-run effects are outside of their control. Realistically, all they can do is target the medium-term trend, which is likely to result in more rate hikes in North America. (The European outlook is clouded by a more severe energy shock.)
Labour Market is Domestic
Developed central banks do not attempt to move their currency enough to offset external price changes, on the basis that such a strategy is not feasible. Therefore, they need to worry about domestic conditions, and let the external sector take care of itself. Since governments have largely eschewed price control, about the only control lever is attempting to regulate price pressures via the labour market.
The figure above depicts what I see as one of the unusual factors behind the post-pandemic period — the drop in the civilian labour force in the United States. To be clear, despite the title of my article, this is a variable that the central bank has only a limited ability to influence. However, it generated unusual constraints for policy.
The labour force dropped for a number of reasons: ongoing population ageing (which determines the long-term trend), illnesses and deaths due to COVID-19, difficulties with child care, immigration slowdown, the opioid crisis, and elderly people not wanting to risk illness. I do not currently have a breakdown of the relative importance of these factors, but it is clear that some them have unwound. The question is: once the mechanical bounce is over, what will the trend look like?
Many businesses built their models around workers having no bargaining power, as well relying on hidden costs that are borne by workers (e.g., depreciation of gig economy cars). Such business models are coming under pressure. At some point, such firms will be cut back, either via a recession or business churn. At which point, it is possible that a deflationary bias returns.
Heterodox economists typically emphasise that the percentage of the population in the “labour force” is not the result of some immutable physical law; it depends upon economic conditions. A hot labour market will have the tendency to draw workers back into it. To what extent the central bank can achieve that, they can influence the time series above. That said, I believe that the rapid movements of the level of labour force in 2020 and thereafter was due to the special factors listed above.
Higher rates might cool the housing market, which may also see supply relief if delivery backlogs are cleared, allowing faster completions. Unless policy rates end up closer to 4-5%, I am unsure that they will matter too much for housing activity. There might be a one-time hit to speculative confidence and house prices, but the people who need to buy homes will probably be still in the market.
Immaculate Inflation Expectations Drop?
Many conventional economists might argue that inflation expectations will drop solely because of higher policy rates, and therefore actual inflation will fall (because that’s what the models say!).
The problem with that logic is that nobody in the real world takes those arguments seriously. In practice, household inflation surveys follow gasoline prices. Firms raise prices based on input costs (and whether there is a shortage of their output). Even conventional economists will look at things like NAIRU when answering surveys.
What about speculation? Take a major example — the crypto bros. Internet Austrians are happy to argue that fiat currencies are going to zero because interest rates are too low. Will raising the policy rate fix that? Of course not. They will just pivot to “unsustainable interest spending” as the reason that fiat currencies are going to zero. At this point, nothing is going to stop people from wasting energy solving affinity fraud math puzzles — did going off the Bretton Woods system stop the gold bugs?
It will either take a commodity price crash or a recession to get “inflation expectations” to drop rapidly towards 2%.
The rest of this article consists of comments on topics that are largely outside of central bank control.
Fiscal Policy Tightening
There exact state of fiscal policy is jurisdiction-dependent. However, I think it is safe to say that the overall stance is tightening, at least based on the result of passive factors (increasing nominal activity resulting in a greater tax take).
Trucking Woes Fixed?
I am not familiar enough with the sources or data to offer strong opinions, but the story that I am seeing is that there was a supply response for truck drivers in the United States. Like the commodity markets, the cure for high prices is high prices.
Another factor that will help logistics is an increase in air travel — since passenger aircraft also ship cargo.
If consumer prices spike past the level of income growth, households either have to draw down savings, or cut the volume of spending. To what extent volumes adjust, logistical woes within North America will be reduced on that side as well.
The COVID lockdowns in China creates two offsetting forces. China’s domestic demand is throttled, which might open up some capacity in strained global commodity markets. Going the other way, shipment volumes out of various Chinese ports are being crippled, and so we can expect another wave of supply woes.
As for longer-term issues raised by these shambolic lockdown policies, I am not the person to ask. My uneducated guess is that there might be some balance shifts within domestic Chinese political factions. It also will raise concerns about the reliability of Chinese sources (including the entire logistical chain, like strained ports in California), pushing towards supply chain diversification.
The Ukrainian War
The Russians appear to be regrouping to launch a renewed offensive ahead of the politically sensitive May 9 holiday. It appears likely that this renewed offensive would result in the high water mark for territorial gains for Russia in the South and East for this phase of the war, and so it would be natural to expect a pivot towards a cease fire on the Russian side.
Although it was fairly clear that the thrust by elite Russian units towards Kyiv was doomed, the outcome of the conflict in the South and East is less clear. Although the Ukrainians have put Russian logistical chains under pressure, it is less clear how successful the Russian attempts to do the same. This information disparity is due to the fact that the Ukrainians have much better control of the flow of information coming out of the battlefields.
The main economic issues in the near run are the build up of Russian energy inventories, as well the effect of the war on shipping in the Black Sea. Even if fighting winds down, it seems unclear when the Russian naval blockade of Ukraine will be lifted.
In the longer term, it seems very likely that relations between Russia and Belarus will be frosty with the neighbours on their Western borders, even if other NATO countries elect politicians that are friendlier to the Kremlin. This is likely to have the effect of casting Russia into the role of supplying China with commodities, with associated monetary flows.
Great stuff -- thanks so much for posting these. I especially enjoyed the bit about the Austrians and gold bugs. I mean, it's only been what, 50 years now that Bretton Woods was abandoned? How long does it take for people to realize that their "hard money" shibboleths have no meaning in a "soft currency" world?ReplyDelete
Something for MMT'rs to ponder overReplyDelete
Sergey Glazyev is a man living right in the eye of our current geopolitical and geo-economic hurricane. One of the most influential economists in the world, a member of the Russian Academy of Sciences, and a former adviser to the Kremlin from 2012 to 2019, for the past three years he has helmed Moscow’s uber strategic portfolio as Minister in Charge of Integration and Macroeconomics of the Eurasia Economic Union (EAEU).
Glazyev’s recent intellectual production has been nothing short of transformative, epitomized by his essay Sanctions and Sovereignty and an extensive discussion of the new, emerging geo-economic paradigm in an interview to a Russian business magazine.
The architect of what happens next
Might be worthwhile writing a piece on this Brian via the MMT lens.
Hi - I guess I could take a look, but currently tied up with other projects. The economic problems Russia faces are real economy ones, and a lot depends on what they can trade for.Delete
People like Escobar and Doctorow have been hyperventilating and hypersalivating over the prospect of this new financial system.Delete
Glazyev says he has studied the internal contradictions in the West's financial system and sees its demise.
He argues that a new financial order based on the rouble and the yuan is emerging.
However, he neglects to discern the internal contradictions of this new system.
He wants the new system to be based on a gold convertible rouble (because he is Russian and a convertible rouble would reflect Russia's strength in commodities) yet he puts aside the fact the Chinese will want the system to be based on the trade and capital markets strengths of the yuan.
He also sweeps under the carpet the fact that India, another putative major player in the new system, is the geostrategic competitor of China.
These internal conflicts will engender instabilities in this new system.
Question: Elvira Nabiullina has been reconfirmed as the head of the Russian Central Bank. What would you do differently, compared to her previous actions? What is the main guiding principle involved in your different approaches?ReplyDelete
Glazyev: The difference between our approaches is very simple. Her policies are an orthodox implementation of IMF recommendations and dogmas of the Washington paradigm, while my recommendations are based on the scientific method and empirical evidence accumulated over the last hundred years in leading countries.
"....while my recommendations are based on the scientific method..."Delete
Read Marxist dialectics. The problem is he has failed to applied those dialectics to his own new financial system.
I'm not clear on how higher rates would cool the housing market. From the consumer angle, my gut tells me that consumers care about their monthly payments, and the total loan cost. So if rates go up, I could see that having little effect on the total costs of home purchase.ReplyDelete
I guess, the difference is, lower rates with higher home prices, mean more equity, which can be leveraged elsewhere HELOCs, reverse mortgages etc. So even if the total cost of a 30 yr mortgage stays the same, higher rates would mean lower equity values, and perhaps reduce household wealth and purchasing power.
But not clear to me the effect rates have on builders and developers, or speculators. Well, really I am just disappointed there on no rooftop yurts available to live in.